The writing process is vital, where you leave the best of what you have. The creative act is an act of donation in which you put on paper that part of himself on which people do not know. In a book a writer leaves as honest about himself. I started writing love poetry linked to failures in any one literary vocation at first used as a vent or expansion needed encouragement. Then one begins to wonder if one could become a writer. From the 16io around the world and traveled to the center of the earth. Beyond the physical experience of inner experience is necessary, it must be lived and extract the perfume, that once you have had a receptive process, becomes a raw material of the novel.
physical autobiography I do in my novels, I've never been to France
I have my formula, with the passage of time as it acquires the ability to craft and write a novel, I find it harder. The reason is that because one acquires over time
awareness work and responsibility. When I was young I dared to write critically without trial, as time goes on trial this forces me to meditate more. I'ma writer
fast and slow gestation of the book. Ernest Hemingway said, "A good story is like an iceberg, there is only one fifth of that is reflected on paper, there are other four-fifths that the reader can see and sense there. " In avoiding these four parts is the art of good writers, and discover the wisdom of the writer. When the writer decides to concoct the story that round, the fifth is looming. The other four parties are quick training, can take months, years or a lifetime. Perhaps this novel could put all the knowledge of life, such as "The Leopard" of Lampedusa.The gestation of the novel
can start with a spark
. Usually something small often sets in motion the mechanisms ofto outrageous. I wanted to know how man can face anything.
Resistance and the French people's attitude. Not yet felt in the novel. There was another cause for reflection, I've always been a great lover of French culture, the best literature in global terms. In the quest simplifier Borges said: "All literature can be summarized in aTMLXC the past.
Then I went to the next phase
the documentation
the writer's idea is not solidified but changing idea. In this case I wanted to write an epic novel and ended up doing a novel that questions the epic. I wanted to write a novel about heroes, and I ended up writing a novel in which alleged heroes are as cruel as the villains, or heroism and villainy only depends on the perspective that look.
Similarly, I discovered that the French company collaborated with the occupation and there was little resistance. For a year and a half there was no act or protest against the occupation. When an attempt was made in December 41 was notby submission of the invader, but because Hitler had attacked the Soviet Union and the French Communists, who until then had collaborated with the occupation. From that moment they decide to protest. The French Communists were fighting for their ideology and not the country was communism against Nazism. These findings will change the concept of history, and in doing so forces you to make your characters are less schematic than previously thought.
For my novel, the protagonist, it would be a patriotic hero of the French Resistance, became a troubled hero, he is aware of the cause it serves is debatable. When a soldier killswith those characters. Locked in a room alone with them day after day to see how they evolve, is a process that can take a long time.
I always liked it better tell my stories from a perspective, a character who has lived the history that counts. For me, the more attractive perspectivism a novel. For example, sure you always have two friends who have fought and each has a different version of the discussion. A novel is like. Depending on who tell us, is going to do from its convenience, is being, cultural traditions, beliefs, preferences ... so it's important to choose the voiceover. Will be serving as the amalgamating of all the events we are going to tell. The choice of narrator and his voice, if you are a lazy person or momentum, amorous or retracted ... this is going to set the tone of the novel. Your choiceSPECT in a false third party. There is an omniscient narrator who tells it, is told from the perspective of someone who has facilitated the narrator that knowledge. Therefore, the novel plays on the credulity of the reader, is a story in the missing parts and to complete as you progress in these three stories. In fact they are stories told from the perspective of these three characters.
"The Tempest" at one point I reached a dead end. The protagonist had stayed in a hostel that night he witnessed a murder and the morning is questioned at the police station. While being questioned the police visit the museum director who had invited him to Venice to see the box " The temp
this whole process, that part of the invisible life of writing. From the moment I decided to write need to be surrounded by a rite freak. The job of the writer is so evanescent that any disruption is reduced to smithereens. A writer has no boss, hours or companions with whom to share their hesitations. T is aork of absolute solitude and no monitor for anyone. Its major risk is the laziness . The narrator can not rely on the inspiration
, perhaps only the poet who is living with the sublime, if the narrator is going to be incapable of writing a novel. Writing a novel is an exercise in consistency, discipline and renunciation