Saturday, January 26, 2008

Instrukcja Obslugi Skuter Chinski

tion is diffuse. There are no methods for writing novels, each have their own. This is not a method but a way forward for the vocation. Not written as a story, a poem or a novel.

The writing process is vital, where you leave the best of what you have. The creative act is an act of donation in which you put on paper that part of himself on which people do not know. In a book a writer leaves as honest about himself. I started writing love poetry linked to failures in any one literary vocation at first used as a vent or expansion needed encouragement. Then one begins to wonder if one could become a writer. From the 16io around the world and traveled to the center of the earth. Beyond the physical experience of inner experience is necessary, it must be lived and extract the perfume, that once you have had a receptive process, becomes a raw material of the novel.

physical autobiography I do in my novels, I've never been to France occupied or has belonged to the resistance, these are aspects of my latest novel "The Seventh Veil."

things I've been living with my characters , every writer makes a spiritual autobiography that conveys the impression of sincerity reader. Feel that this is something that is iormulate to write, there are writers who are put on paper

and improvise. There are other novels that chew the cud and need it over, and just start writing when they know the story line by line to be counted.

I have my formula, with the passage of time as it acquires the ability to craft and write a novel, I find it harder. The reason is that because one acquires over time

awareness work and responsibility. When I was young I dared to write critically without trial, as time goes on trial this forces me to meditate more. I'ma writer

fast and slow gestation of the book. Ernest Hemingway said, "A good story is like an iceberg, there is only one fifth of that is reflected on paper, there are other four-fifths that the reader can see and sense there. " In avoiding these four parts is the art of good writers, and discover the wisdom of the writer. When the writer decides to concoct the story that round, the fifth is looming. The other four parties are quick training, can take months, years or a lifetime. Perhaps this novel could put all the knowledge of life, such as "The Leopard" of Lampedusa.

The gestation of the novel

can start with a spark

. Usually something small often sets in motion the mechanisms ofto outrageous. I wanted to know how man can face anything.

The story always has winners and the mentality in which they are entrenched in the awareness that there are dark corners. One was in France during the years of occupation. There were no large studies

World War II in France, there was a mythical vision of

Resistance and the French people's attitude. Not yet felt in the novel. There was another cause for reflection, I've always been a great lover of French culture, the best literature in global terms. In the quest simplifier Borges said: "All literature can be summarized in aTMLXC the past.

Then I went to the next phase

the documentation paramount. No need to read three thousand books to write a novel, but one should feel at ease to not hesitate to write. One then you can alter circumstances. The documentation work of "The Seventh Veil" was laborious, because recreating ancient times is complicated. Writing about the early Christians no problem, because they can release it to say that one was wearing a robe or a toga. However, if we talk of 1943 is not the same. For example, in "The Da Vinci Item code", initially spoke to the bad guy is a monk of Opus. Obviously notri that was different and changed my conception of the novel. It is something interesting in the process,

the writer's idea is not solidified but changing idea. In this case I wanted to write an epic novel and ended up doing a novel that questions the epic. I wanted to write a novel about heroes, and I ended up writing a novel in which alleged heroes are as cruel as the villains, or heroism and villainy only depends on the perspective that look.

Similarly, I discovered that the French company collaborated with the occupation and there was little resistance. For a year and a half there was no act or protest against the occupation. When an attempt was made in December 41 was notby submission of the invader, but because Hitler had attacked the Soviet Union and the French Communists, who until then had collaborated with the occupation. From that moment they decide to protest. The French Communists were fighting for their ideology and not the country was communism against Nazism. These findings will change the concept of history, and in doing so forces you to make your characters are less schematic than previously thought.

For my novel, the protagonist, it would be a patriotic hero of the French Resistance, became a troubled hero, he is aware of the cause it serves is debatable. When a soldier killswith those characters. Locked in a room alone with them day after day to see how they evolve, is a process that can take a long time.

There are writers who need more steps, but ultimately in my case, I need to choose the voiceover . It is important because that is what will shape the world we are going to count. There is a classic narrator, the omniscient, having complete control of all history, someone who climbs a tower and from there gives an overview of the landscape. A limping devil is capable of lifting the roofs of houses and discover all that is cooked in each.

I always liked it better tell my stories from a perspective, a character who has lived the history that counts. For me, the more attractive perspectivism a novel. For example, sure you always have two friends who have fought and each has a different version of the discussion. A novel is like. Depending on who tell us, is going to do from its convenience, is being, cultural traditions, beliefs, preferences ... so it's important to choose the voiceover. Will be serving as the amalgamating of all the events we are going to tell. The choice of narrator and his voice, if you are a lazy person or momentum, amorous or retracted ... this is going to set the tone of the novel. Your choiceSPECT in a false third party. There is an omniscient narrator who tells it, is told from the perspective of someone who has facilitated the narrator that knowledge. Therefore, the novel plays on the credulity of the reader, is a story in the missing parts and to complete as you progress in these three stories. In fact they are stories told from the perspective of these three characters.

Once I have a starting point, I write . I skip a step that some writers do, that is to tread mentally plot of the novel. I do not, I keep on writing without having a clear argument, I am confident that the dynamics ofsibilities of my imagination. As I approach the end of my novel, I'm bored of writing and I have to stop to make an effort. When I enjoy a novel where I walk in the dark. Each day write to me becomes my imagination test myself and be consistent with the story I'm telling. This has led me to strange situations. When I wrote

"The Tempest" at one point I reached a dead end. The protagonist had stayed in a hostel that night he witnessed a murder and the morning is questioned at the police station. While being questioned the police visit the museum director who had invited him to Venice to see the box " The temp tad. " The director invited him to sleep and to stay at home, but the player had his belongings in the hostel. The protagonist goes to collect his belongings at the hostel. I was a first-time writer, I began to have an absurd situation, the route, had no sense of narrative. Just when I was lost, suddenly it occurred to me something that marked the whole frame of the novel. When the protagonist arrives to the hotel, surprised by a conversation between the landlady and the police commissioner. They were lovers and they were talking secretly to the person who had died the previous night he had slept well that night in the hostel. Also he had left his suitcase and that suitcase was essentialin the development of the novel. It just occurred to me at that time, I cleared up what the novel itself. The internal logic of the novel, do you write that while you will elucidate aspects that at first you can not suspect.

The writing

itself takes me less time

this whole process, that part of the invisible life of writing. From the moment I decided to write need to be surrounded by a rite freak. The job of the writer is so evanescent that any disruption is reduced to smithereens. A writer has no boss, hours or companions with whom to share their hesitations. T is aork of absolute solitude and no monitor for anyone. Its major risk is the laziness . The narrator can not rely on the inspiration

, perhaps only the poet who is living with the sublime, if the narrator is going to be incapable of writing a novel. Writing a novel is an exercise in consistency, discipline and renunciation daily. For that the writer must take the task of a series of simulations, which suggests that their work is more solid than it really is. I like to surround myself with many rituals that make my work something constant. Always write by hand the morning, fasting and waste paper. The latter was born in me for a green itching and became a hobby. So I can not writebir new paper, the pape used has become for me a spark that powers the internal combustion engine of the structure. Whenever I have to write my novels in my house, surrounded by my books, with the table at the height that my vertebrae are accustomed and the ass glued to the seat that is made in the shape of my ass. I write six days a week, between eight o'clock and three o'clock. The reason for writing fasting is perhaps the most curious for their masochistic component, rather curious. I like to feel when I write a physical feeling of tiredness. I've never done manual labor, much less gymnastics, God save me, yet I like that feeling. To enter you need to have all neurons active for combining wordsine months. What happens is that time is of a savage intensity, not only writing but also because when you stop writing one is obsessed with the life of the novel and real life overrides. Your mind is constantly in history, this is hard for you and the people around you, because you lose perception of physical reality. It is a very demanding job, because even when you sleep you still vampirized the novel, and this for me is the hardest. I throw in a constant state of insomnia and fatigue increases, the final write in a state of sleepwalking. The way to combat that for me is to eat a lot during the time that I write. I passed as Robert de Niro when those roles makes you fat. In each novel I write fat and stout,